Lloyd v Jagpal & Anor

Lloyd v Jagpal & Anor

The application to strike out was dismissed because the claimant provided the images upon request, the statement of case disclosed reasonable grounds, and any alleged disadvantage to the second defendant could have been resolved by a simple request for particulars or disclosure.

Parties
Claimant: Danielle Lloyd; First Defendant: Deepak Jagpal; Second Defendant: Carphone Warehouse
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 July 2009
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Strike Out
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Breach of Confidence, Copyright Infringement, Vicarious Liability, Data Protection, Abuse of Process
Contract Tort Data Protection Privacy Breach of Contract Breach of Confidence Copyright Infringement Vicarious Liability +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Danielle Lloyd

Claimant

Deepak Jagpal

First Defendant

Carphone Warehouse

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Application for Strike Out

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the statement of case discloses reasonable grounds for bringing the claim
  2. 2 Whether the particulars of claim are defective for failing to identify images
  3. 3 Whether the claim is an abuse of process

Ratio Decidendi

The application to strike out was dismissed because the claimant provided the images upon request, the statement of case disclosed reasonable grounds, and any alleged disadvantage to the second defendant could have been resolved by a simple request for particulars or disclosure.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application to strike out dismissed