Arlington House Ltd & Ors v Torbay Care Trust Pt Hd
The claim for breach of contract under the umbrella agreement and individual care contracts discloses a real prospect of success and should proceed to trial. The claims for breach of duty of care, tortious interference with third-party contracts, and damages under the Human Rights Act 1998 do not disclose arguable causes of action and are struck out.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Arlington House Ltd; Claimant/respondent: Mrs Caroline Susan Clerk; Claimant/respondent: Mr Alexander Mann; Defendant/appellant: Torbay Care Trust PT HD
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application (strike Out and Summary Judgment)
- Outcome
- Application to strike out and for summary judgment granted in part; claims for breach of duty of care, tortious interference, and Human Rights Act damages struck out; claim for breach of contract to proceed to trial; costs reserved to trial judge.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Tortious Interference, Duty of Care, Human Rights Act 1998, Summary Judgment, Strike Out Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Arlington House Ltd
Claimant/respondent
Mrs Caroline Susan Clerk
Claimant/respondent
Mr Alexander Mann
Claimant/respondent
Torbay Care Trust PT HD
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application (strike Out and Summary Judgment)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim for breach of contract should proceed to trial
- 2 Whether claims for tortious interference, breach of duty of care, and damages under the Human Rights Act 1998 disclose arguable causes of action
- 3 Whether summary judgment or strike out is appropriate for the pleaded claims
Ratio Decidendi
The claim for breach of contract under the umbrella agreement and individual care contracts discloses a real prospect of success and should proceed to trial. The claims for breach of duty of care, tortious interference with third-party contracts, and damages under the Human Rights Act 1998 do not disclose arguable causes of action and are struck out.
Court Disposition
Application to strike out and for summary judgment granted in part; claims for breach of duty of care, tortious interference, and Human Rights Act damages struck out; claim for breach of contract to proceed to trial; costs reserved to trial judge.
Orders
- Paragraphs 30 to 36 of the particulars of claim struck out
- Application for summary judgment in relation to paragraph 28 of the particulars of claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment