Diametric Metal Fabrications Ltd v Reilor Ltd

Diametric Metal Fabrications Ltd v Reilor Ltd

The defendants failed to prove that the claimant was responsible for the alleged defects in the Gib Closers, as the failures were not shown to be caused by any breach of contract or duty by the claimant. The claimant followed the defendants' instructions, used their tooling, and any wear was fair wear and tear. The claimant is entitled to payment for goods supplied and stock held at termination. The defendants' counterclaims and set-off fail for lack of proof.

Parties
Claimant: Diametric Metal Fabrications Limited; First Defendant: Reilor Limited; Second Defendant: Reilor Logistics Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 September 2006
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant; defendants' counterclaims and set-off dismissed.
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Product Liability, Set Off, Damages, Novation, Implied Terms
Contract Law Commercial Law Breach of Contract Product Liability Set Off Damages Novation Implied Terms

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Diametric Metal Fabrications Limited

Claimant

Reilor Limited

First Defendant

Reilor Logistics Limited

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Contract Dispute / Judgment After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is liable for alleged defects in Gib Closers supplied to the defendants
  2. 2 Whether the defendants are entitled to set-off or counterclaim for losses allegedly suffered due to defective products
  3. 3 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment for goods supplied and stock held at termination

Ratio Decidendi

The defendants failed to prove that the claimant was responsible for the alleged defects in the Gib Closers, as the failures were not shown to be caused by any breach of contract or duty by the claimant. The claimant followed the defendants' instructions, used their tooling, and any wear was fair wear and tear. The claimant is entitled to payment for goods supplied and stock held at termination. The defendants' counterclaims and set-off fail for lack of proof.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant; defendants' counterclaims and set-off dismissed.

Orders

  • Judgment for the claimant against the first defendant for £23,055.24 principal sum.
  • Judgment for the claimant against the second defendant for £34,646.30 principal sum.