Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation Ors v Privalov Ors [2010] EWHC 3199 (Comm) (10 December 2010)

Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation Ors v Privalov Ors [2010] EWHC 3199 (Comm) (10 December 2010)

The court found that the claimants established, on the balance of probabilities, that the principal defendants (including Mr. Nikitin and associated companies) engaged in dishonest schemes to divert secret commissions and profits from ship transactions, in breach of fiduciary and contractual duties. The court held...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2010] EWHC 3199 (Comm)
Parties
Claimants: Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation and 75 ors.; Defendants: Yuri Privalov and 28 ors.; Part 20 Claimants: Yuri Nikitin and anr.; Part 20 Defendants: H. Clarkson & Company Ltd.; Claimants: Intrigue Shipping Inc. and 50 ors.; Defendants: H. Clarkson & Company Ltd. and 8 ors.; Part 20 Claimants: Yuri Nikitin and Anor.; Part 20 Defendants: H. Clarkson and Company Ltd.; Claimants: Fiona Trust & Holding Corp. and 9 Ors.; Defendants: Dmitri Skarga and 3 Ors.; Claimants: Southbank Navigation Ltd. and 6 Ors.; Defendants: H. Clarkson and Company Ltd.
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 December 2010
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Multi Party Fraud and Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims (with Part 20 Proceedings) / High Court Trial Judgment
Outcome
Claims for recovery of secret commissions and profits against principal defendants (including Mr. Nikitin and associated companies) allowed; claims against certain unrepresented or settled defendants dismissed or stayed; restitution and account of profits ordered.
Legal Topics
Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Fraud, Dishonest Assistance, Secret Commissions, Conflict of Laws, Director's Duties, Remedies for Breach of Duty, Tracing and Recovery of Misappropriated Assets
Commercial Law Company Law Employment Law Private International Law Breach of Fiduciary Duty Fraud Dishonest Assistance Secret Commissions +4 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 16
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fiona Trust & Holding Corporation and 75 ors.

Claimants

Yuri Privalov and 28 ors.

Defendants

Yuri Nikitin and anr.

Part 20 Claimants

H. Clarkson & Company Ltd.

Part 20 Defendants

Intrigue Shipping Inc. and 50 ors.

Claimants

H. Clarkson & Company Ltd. and 8 ors.

Defendants

Yuri Nikitin and Anor.

Part 20 Claimants

H. Clarkson and Company Ltd.

Part 20 Defendants

Fiona Trust & Holding Corp. and 9 Ors.

Claimants

Dmitri Skarga and 3 Ors.

Defendants

Southbank Navigation Ltd. and 6 Ors.

Claimants

H. Clarkson and Company Ltd.

Defendants

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Multi Party Fraud and Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims (with Part 20 Proceedings) / High Court Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether defendants (including former directors and business associates) dishonestly procured or assisted in transactions adverse to claimants' interests
  2. 2 Whether commissions and profits received by defendants were secret and improper
  3. 3 Whether claimants are entitled to recover sums paid out under various commission and sale/leaseback schemes

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claimants established, on the balance of probabilities, that the principal defendants (including Mr. Nikitin and associated companies) engaged in dishonest schemes to divert secret commissions and profits from ship transactions, in breach of fiduciary and contractual duties. The court held that English law governed most claims, and that contractual limitations under Russian law did not protect defendants from liability for intentional dishonesty. The court ordered restitution of misappropriated sums and profits, and dismissed defences based on alleged business justification or contractual limitation.

Court Disposition

Claims for recovery of secret commissions and profits against principal defendants (including Mr. Nikitin and associated companies) allowed; claims against certain unrepresented or settled defendants dismissed or stayed; restitution and account of profits ordered.

Orders

  • Defendants to pay claimants sums misappropriated under commission and sale/leaseback schemes (amounts to be assessed)
  • Defendants to account for profits received from impugned transactions