Atkinson & Anor v Varma (aka Sanjeev Varma & Ors
Mr Varma acted as a de facto director and breached fiduciary duties by misappropriating company funds for personal use and transferring £3,122,841.75 to GCFZE, a company he owned and controlled, for no consideration. GCFZE is jointly and severally liable with Mr Varma for knowing receipt of those sums. The explanations and documents provided by Mr Varma regarding the existence of diamonds and jewellery and the role of Mr Singh were not credible. The sums are recoverable as equitable compensation with compound interest. The claim against Mr Khadka is adjourned to trial.
- Parties
- Applicant/joint Liquidator: Paul Atkinson; Applicant/joint Liquidator: Glyn Mummery; First Respondent: Sanjiv Varma (aka Sanjeev Varma); Second Respondent: Arjun Khadka; Third Respondent: Grosvenor Consultants FZE; Fourth Respondent: Siddhant Varma (aka Sid Varma); Fifth Respondent: Jonathan England
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency/companies / Judgment After Trial of Applications for Judgment and Delivery Up
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Joint Liquidators against Mr Varma and GCFZE; application against Mr Khadka adjourned to trial; costs and quantum of costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Knowing Receipt, Equitable Compensation, Director Duties, Transaction at Undervalue, Debarring Orders, Liquidation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Paul Atkinson
Applicant/joint Liquidator
Glyn Mummery
Applicant/joint Liquidator
Sanjiv Varma (aka Sanjeev Varma)
First Respondent
Arjun Khadka
Second Respondent
Grosvenor Consultants FZE
Third Respondent
Siddhant Varma (aka Sid Varma)
Fourth Respondent
Jonathan England
Fifth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Insolvency/companies / Judgment After Trial of Applications for Judgment and Delivery Up
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Varma acted as a de facto or shadow director and breached fiduciary duties
- 2 Whether GCFZE is liable for knowing receipt and/or transaction at undervalue
- 3 Whether sums were misappropriated from the Company and are recoverable as equitable compensation
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Varma acted as a de facto director and breached fiduciary duties by misappropriating company funds for personal use and transferring £3,122,841.75 to GCFZE, a company he owned and controlled, for no consideration. GCFZE is jointly and severally liable with Mr Varma for knowing receipt of those sums. The explanations and documents provided by Mr Varma regarding the existence of diamonds and jewellery and the role of Mr Singh were not credible. The sums are recoverable as equitable compensation with compound interest. The claim against Mr Khadka is adjourned to trial.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Joint Liquidators against Mr Varma and GCFZE; application against Mr Khadka adjourned to trial; costs and quantum of costs reserved.
Orders
- Mr Varma and GCFZE to pay £3,122,841.75 jointly and severally to the Joint Liquidators as equitable compensation, with compound interest at 8% per annum.
- Mr Varma to pay £140,000 for misappropriated company funds from the Casa Account, with compound interest at 8% per annum.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment