Mitchell and another (Joint Liquidators of MBI International & Partners Inc (In Liquidation)) v Sheikh Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber
The Sheikh was liable for breach of fiduciary duty as a de facto fiduciary by arrogating to himself the power to effect the 2016 Share Transfers after liquidation, regardless of formal authority. No unpaid vendor’s lien existed over the 891K shares because the parties’ objective intention was to exclude such a lien...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent/appellant: Mitchell and another (Joint Liquidators of MBI International & Partners Inc (In Liquidation)); Appellant/respondent: Sheikh Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber; Third Party (subject Company): JJW Hotels & Resorts Holding Inc (JJW Inc); Third Party (subject Company): JJW Hotels & Resorts UK Holdings Ltd (JJW UK); Respondent/appellant: JJW Hotels & Resorts Holding Ltd (Guernsey) (JJW Guernsey)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal by the Liquidators allowed; Sheikh’s appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Equitable Compensation, Knowing Receipt, Unpaid Vendor's Lien, Valuation of Loss, Counterfactual Causation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mitchell and another (Joint Liquidators of MBI International & Partners Inc (In Liquidation))
Applicant/respondent/appellant
Sheikh Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber
Appellant/respondent
JJW Hotels & Resorts Holding Inc (JJW Inc)
Third Party (subject Company)
JJW Hotels & Resorts UK Holdings Ltd (JJW UK)
Third Party (subject Company)
JJW Hotels & Resorts Holding Ltd (Guernsey) (JJW Guernsey)
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Supreme Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Sheikh Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber was in breach of fiduciary duty in effecting the 2016 Share Transfers after liquidation removed his powers as director under BVI law.
- 2 Whether the Company suffered no loss because the 891K shares were subject to unpaid vendor’s liens.
- 3 How to calculate the loss of the value of the Company’s 891K shares in JJW Inc when, after their transfer, the value was destroyed by the subsequent transfer of all JJW Inc’s assets and liabilities to JJW UK.
Ratio Decidendi
The Sheikh was liable for breach of fiduciary duty as a de facto fiduciary by arrogating to himself the power to effect the 2016 Share Transfers after liquidation, regardless of formal authority. No unpaid vendor’s lien existed over the 891K shares because the parties’ objective intention was to exclude such a lien to facilitate an IPO. The Company suffered loss equal to the value of the 891K shares at the time of misappropriation, and the Sheikh could not rely on the subsequent destruction of value by the 2017 Asset and Liability Transfer, as he failed to prove he was not involved in or did not benefit from that event.
Court Disposition
Appeal by the Liquidators allowed; Sheikh’s appeal dismissed.
Orders
- Order of the trial judge reinstated: Sheikh Mohamed Bin Issa Al Jaber to pay €67,123,403.36 in equitable compensation to the Company.
- No unpaid vendor’s lien found; knowing receipt liability of JJW Guernsey affirmed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment