Nixon v Chanceoption Developments Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 558 (10 April 2002)
Respondents were in clear breach of statutory duty by failing to provide guard-rails and safe scaffolding. The claimant was not contributorily negligent as he was doing his job and no warning was given. Liability established and damages awarded.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 558
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Anthony Peter Nixon; Defendant/respondent: Chanceoption Developments Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Statutory Duty, Construction (health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1996, Contributory Negligence, Smith V Manchester Damages, Part 36 Costs and Interest
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Anthony Peter Nixon
Claimant/appellant
Chanceoption Developments Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From County Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employer breached statutory duty under Construction Regulations
- 2 Whether the claimant was contributorily negligent
- 3 Assessment of damages for loss of earning capacity
Ratio Decidendi
Respondents were in clear breach of statutory duty by failing to provide guard-rails and safe scaffolding. The claimant was not contributorily negligent as he was doing his job and no warning was given. Liability established and damages awarded.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment for claimant
Orders
- Judgment entered for claimant for £15,000 general damages, £1,483.52 special damages, £25,000 Smith v Manchester damages, plus interest to be calculated
- Costs awarded to claimant on indemnity basis from relevant date
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment