Garston & Ors v Scottish Widows Fund & Life Assurance Society [1998] EWCA Civ 1091 (25 June 1998)

Garston & Ors v Scottish Widows Fund & Life Assurance Society [1998] EWCA Civ 1091 (25 June 1998)

The notices served by the plaintiffs were effective to determine the lease on the correct date, despite specifying the wrong date, because a reasonable recipient would have understood the plaintiffs' intention. The section 26 requests did not operate to determine the lease prior to its contractual expiry date.

Citation
[1998] EWCA Civ 1091
Parties
Plaintiff/appellant: Eric Michael Garston; Plaintiff/appellant: Alan Kilsha Toulson; Plaintiff/appellant: Paul Denzil Nicholas; Plaintiff/appellant: Charles Edward Cameron Gardner; Defendant/respondent: Scottish Widows Fund and Life Assurance Society
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
25 June 1998
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Break Clauses in Leases, Effectiveness of Notices to Determine Lease, Interpretation of Statutory Provisions, Section 26 Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
Landlord and Tenant Contract Law Property Law Break Clauses in Leases Effectiveness of Notices to Determine Lease Interpretation of Statutory Provisions Section 26 Landlord and Tenant Act 1954

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Eric Michael Garston

Plaintiff/appellant

Alan Kilsha Toulson

Plaintiff/appellant

Paul Denzil Nicholas

Plaintiff/appellant

Charles Edward Cameron Gardner

Plaintiff/appellant

Scottish Widows Fund and Life Assurance Society

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a notice specifying the wrong date to determine a lease is effective after Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd [1997] AC 749
  2. 2 Whether a request for a new tenancy under section 26 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 can itself determine the lease

Ratio Decidendi

The notices served by the plaintiffs were effective to determine the lease on the correct date, despite specifying the wrong date, because a reasonable recipient would have understood the plaintiffs' intention. The section 26 requests did not operate to determine the lease prior to its contractual expiry date.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Appeal allowed with costs
  • Judge's order for costs to stand