Star China Media Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Office of Communications [2023] EWCA Civ 843 (14 July 2023)
Ofcom's decision to impose a £125,000 penalty was justified and proportionate to the legitimate aim of ensuring due impartiality in news broadcasting. The penalty was necessary to deter other broadcasters, not just Star China, and the revocation of Star China's licence did not require a reduction in the penalty. The decision fell within Ofcom's margin of appreciation as regulator and did not infringe Article 10 ECHR.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Civ 843
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Star China Media Limited; Defendant/respondent: The Office of Communications (Ofcom)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Broadcasting Regulation, Freedom of Expression, Proportionality, Due Impartiality, Sanctions and Penalties, Article 10 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Star China Media Limited
Claimant/appellant
The Office of Communications (Ofcom)
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Ofcom's imposition of a £125,000 penalty on Star China for breaches of due impartiality was lawful and proportionate under Article 10 ECHR, particularly after revocation of Star China's broadcasting licence.
Ratio Decidendi
Ofcom's decision to impose a £125,000 penalty was justified and proportionate to the legitimate aim of ensuring due impartiality in news broadcasting. The penalty was necessary to deter other broadcasters, not just Star China, and the revocation of Star China's licence did not require a reduction in the penalty. The decision fell within Ofcom's margin of appreciation as regulator and did not infringe Article 10 ECHR.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment