Reinwood Ltd v L Brown & Sons Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1090 (17 October 2008)
The contractor's notice of determination dated 4 July 2006 was valid because the earlier notice of default dated 12 May 2005 was valid, the employer did not serve a valid objection, and there was no waiver by the contractor of its right to rely on the earlier default.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Civ 1090
- Parties
- Claimant Appellant: Reinwood Limited; Defendant Respondent: L Brown & Sons Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (technology and Construction Court) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Building Contracts, Contract Determination, VAT Under Construction Contracts, Waiver and Election, Notice Requirements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Reinwood Limited
Claimant Appellant
L Brown & Sons Limited
Defendant Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (technology and Construction Court) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the contractor's notice of determination dated 4 July 2006 was valid based on an earlier default by the employer in April 2005
- 2 Whether the employer's email of 14 April 2005 constituted a valid objection under the contract
- 3 Whether the contractor waived its right to rely on the earlier default by subsequent conduct
Ratio Decidendi
The contractor's notice of determination dated 4 July 2006 was valid because the earlier notice of default dated 12 May 2005 was valid, the employer did not serve a valid objection, and there was no waiver by the contractor of its right to rely on the earlier default.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment