EMERY PLANNING PARTNERSHIP LIMITED v GARIE BEVAN
The claimant failed to discharge the burden of proof regarding the quantum of its claim for professional fees, except for a single counsel's fee note of £1,650, due to insufficient evidential detail on who performed the work, when, and how the fees were calculated. The court upheld the trial judge's dismissal of the claim except for the proven counsel's fee.
- Parties
- Appellant / Claimant: Emery Planning Partnership Limited; Respondent / Defendant: Garie Bevan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed save for £1,650 counsel's fee note.
- Legal Topics
- Burden of Proof, Quantum of Debt, Case Management, Professional Services Contracts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emery Planning Partnership Limited
Appellant / Claimant
Garie Bevan
Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 What evidence is required to prove the quantum of a debt claim based on professional services contract?
- 2 Did the claimant discharge the burden of proof regarding the amounts claimed under the invoices?
- 3 Should the court have postponed the assessment of damages to a later date?
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to discharge the burden of proof regarding the quantum of its claim for professional fees, except for a single counsel's fee note of £1,650, due to insufficient evidential detail on who performed the work, when, and how the fees were calculated. The court upheld the trial judge's dismissal of the claim except for the proven counsel's fee.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed save for £1,650 counsel's fee note.
Orders
- Judgment for claimant in sum of £1,650 plus interest.
- Appeal otherwise dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment