Emery Planning Partnership Ltd v Bevan [2022] EWHC 494 (QB) (03 March 2022)
The claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the quantum of its claim for professional fees, except for a single counsel's fee note for £1,650, which was adequately evidenced. The court upheld the trial judge's decision to dismiss the remainder of the claim, as the burden of proof was not discharged.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 494
- Parties
- Appellant / Claimant: Emery Planning Partnership Limited; Respondent / Defendant: Garie Bevan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From County Court (money Claim) / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed save for £1,650 counsel's fee note.
- Legal Topics
- Burden of Proof, Quantum of Debt, Professional Services, Case Management Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Emery Planning Partnership Limited
Appellant / Claimant
Garie Bevan
Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From County Court (money Claim) / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 What evidence is required to prove the quantum of a debt under a contract for professional services?
- 2 Was the claimant entitled to judgment for the sums claimed based on the evidence provided?
- 3 Should the court have postponed assessment of damages to a later date?
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the quantum of its claim for professional fees, except for a single counsel's fee note for £1,650, which was adequately evidenced. The court upheld the trial judge's decision to dismiss the remainder of the claim, as the burden of proof was not discharged.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed save for £1,650 counsel's fee note.
Orders
- Judgment for claimant in sum of £1,650 plus interest.
- Appeal otherwise dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment