International Entertainment Holdings Limited & Ors v Allianz Insurance PLC
The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care is not a 'policing authority' within the meaning of the NDDA clause. The clause refers to the police or similar bodies whose function is to ensure the law is obeyed and enforced, not to central government or ministers. This finding is dispositive and requires dismissal of the claimants' claims. Even if the Secretary of State were a policing authority, the incident must occur within the one-mile radius, and a case of Covid-19 can be an 'incident' if it endangers human life and calls for a response. The £500,000 limit applies per premises, not per insured, and there is no aggregate limit, as the language does not clearly support the...
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent: International Entertainment Holdings Limited; Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent: ATG London Limited; Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent: Aylesbury Waterside Theatre Limited; Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent: Glasgow Theatres Limited; Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent: Milton Keynes Theatre Limited; Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent: Playhouse Theatre Limited; Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent: Richmond Theatre Limited; Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent: Savoy Theatre Limited; Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent: Stoke-on-Trent Theatres Limited; Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent: The Ambassador Theatre Group (Venues) Limited; Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent: The Duke of York’s Theatre Limited; Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent: The New Wimbledon Theatre Limited; Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent: Theatre Management Limited; Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent: Theatre Royal Brighton Limited; Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent: Woking Turnstyle Limited; Defendant/respondent and Cross Appellant: Allianz Insurance PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; claims dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Business Interruption Insurance, Policy Interpretation, COVID 19 Pandemic, Non Damage Denial of Access Clause
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
International Entertainment Holdings Limited
Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent
ATG London Limited
Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent
Aylesbury Waterside Theatre Limited
Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent
Glasgow Theatres Limited
Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent
Milton Keynes Theatre Limited
Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent
Playhouse Theatre Limited
Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent
Richmond Theatre Limited
Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent
Savoy Theatre Limited
Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent
Stoke-on-Trent Theatres Limited
Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent
The Ambassador Theatre Group (Venues) Limited
Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent
The Duke of York’s Theatre Limited
Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent
The New Wimbledon Theatre Limited
Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent
Theatre Management Limited
Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent
Theatre Royal Brighton Limited
Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent
Woking Turnstyle Limited
Claimant/appellant and Cross Respondent
Allianz Insurance PLC
Defendant/respondent and Cross Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care is a 'policing authority' under the NDDA clause
- 2 Whether the presence of a case of Covid-19 amounts to an 'incident likely to endanger human life' within the meaning of the clause
- 3 Whether the incident must occur within the one-mile radius specified in the policy
Ratio Decidendi
The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care is not a 'policing authority' within the meaning of the NDDA clause. The clause refers to the police or similar bodies whose function is to ensure the law is obeyed and enforced, not to central government or ministers. This finding is dispositive and requires dismissal of the claimants' claims. Even if the Secretary of State were a policing authority, the incident must occur within the one-mile radius, and a case of Covid-19 can be an 'incident' if it endangers human life and calls for a response. The £500,000 limit applies per premises, not per insured, and there is no aggregate limit, as the language does not clearly support the...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; claims dismissed
Orders
- Declaration that the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care is not a policing authority within the meaning of clause S/30/1 of the policy
- No indemnity payable under the NDDA clause for Covid-19-related closures
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment