Frozen Value Ltd v Heron Foods Ltd

Frozen Value Ltd v Heron Foods Ltd

A landlord cannot aggregate successive interests to satisfy the five year rule in section 30(2) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 if, during the relevant five year period, there was a break in the landlord's status as competent landlord. The five year rule requires continuity of competent landlord status throughout the period. Since Heron was not the competent landlord for part of the five years, it is precluded from relying on ground (g) to oppose the grant of a new tenancy.

Parties
Claimant/appellant: Frozen Value Limited; Defendant/respondent: Heron Foods Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 April 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed (majority decision)
Legal Topics
Business Tenancies, Security of Tenure, Landlord's Right to Oppose New Tenancy, Interpretation of Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, Five Year Rule Under Section 30(2)
Landlord and Tenant Law Business Tenancies Security of Tenure Landlord's Right to Oppose New Tenancy Interpretation of Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 Five Year Rule Under Section 30(2)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Frozen Value Limited

Claimant/appellant

Heron Foods Limited

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From County Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a landlord is precluded from relying on ground (g) of section 30(1) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 by virtue of section 30(2) (the five year rule), where there was a break in the landlord's status as competent landlord during the relevant five year period.
  2. 2 Whether successive leasehold interests held by the landlord can be aggregated for the purposes of the five year rule if there was a period when the landlord was not the competent landlord.

Ratio Decidendi

A landlord cannot aggregate successive interests to satisfy the five year rule in section 30(2) of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 if, during the relevant five year period, there was a break in the landlord's status as competent landlord. The five year rule requires continuity of competent landlord status throughout the period. Since Heron was not the competent landlord for part of the five years, it is precluded from relying on ground (g) to oppose the grant of a new tenancy.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed (majority decision)

Orders

  • Case remitted to Sheffield County Court to determine the terms of Frozen's new tenancy.