Edwards & Walkden (Norfolk) Ltd & Ors v City of London
The tenants are not entitled to rent reductions based on the City's income from commercial offices or the car park, as there is no statutory or contractual requirement to offset such income against rents or service charges. The appropriate payment structure for new tenancies is a rent exclusive of service charges, with tenants' contributions to services covered by a separate variable service charge, as this best reflects fairness, market practice, and the principle that tenants should bear the actual costs of services provided.
- Parties
- Claimants: Edwards & Walkden (Norfolk) Limited & ors; Defendants: The Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of London
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 September 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
- Outcome
- Preliminary issues determined in favour of the City (Defendant).
- Legal Topics
- Business Tenancies, Service Charges, Rent Determination, Statutory Interpretation, Market Premises
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Edwards & Walkden (Norfolk) Limited & ors
Claimants
The Mayor and Commonalty and Citizens of the City of London
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment on Preliminary Issues
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether tenants are entitled to rent reductions based on landlord's income from non-market uses (offices, car park) under the 1860 Act; Whether new tenancies should provide for an all-inclusive rent or a rent plus variable service charge under the 1954 Act
Ratio Decidendi
The tenants are not entitled to rent reductions based on the City's income from commercial offices or the car park, as there is no statutory or contractual requirement to offset such income against rents or service charges. The appropriate payment structure for new tenancies is a rent exclusive of service charges, with tenants' contributions to services covered by a separate variable service charge, as this best reflects fairness, market practice, and the principle that tenants should bear the actual costs of services provided.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issues determined in favour of the City (Defendant).
Orders
- Tenants are not entitled to have their rents reduced on account of income received by the City from commercial offices or the car park.
- Rents under new tenancies to be exclusive of service charges, with tenants' contributions to services covered by a separate variable service charge.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment