Adare Finance DAC v (1) Yellowstone Capital Management SA & Anor [2021] EWHC 1680 (Comm) (16 June 2021)
There was a minor breach of the duty of full and frank disclosure by the claimant in failing to fully inform the court of the French proceedings seeking a declaration of unenforceability, but this does not justify setting aside the Part 71 order. The court retains discretion as to the scope of the documents order, but ongoing French proceedings and potential unenforceability do not warrant exclusion of French assets from disclosure at this stage. The documents order stands, subject to minor revisions for clarity and proportionality.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 1680 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Adare Finance DAC; First Defendant: Yellowstone Capital Management S.A.; Second Defendant: Michel Ohayon
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Enforcement Proceedings / Application to Vary/set Aside CPR Part 71 Order
- Outcome
- Application to vary/set aside the documents order refused; minor revisions to the order permitted.
- Legal Topics
- CPR Part 71, Judgments Regulation, Disclosure Obligations, International Comity, Asset Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adare Finance DAC
Claimant
Yellowstone Capital Management S.A.
First Defendant
Michel Ohayon
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Enforcement Proceedings / Application to Vary/set Aside CPR Part 71 Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant failed to make full and frank disclosure in the without notice application for a CPR Part 71 order
- 2 Whether documents relating to assets in France should be excluded from the disclosure order due to ongoing French proceedings and alleged risk of prosecution under French law
- 3 Scope and discretion of the court in ordering production of documents under CPR Part 71
Ratio Decidendi
There was a minor breach of the duty of full and frank disclosure by the claimant in failing to fully inform the court of the French proceedings seeking a declaration of unenforceability, but this does not justify setting aside the Part 71 order. The court retains discretion as to the scope of the documents order, but ongoing French proceedings and potential unenforceability do not warrant exclusion of French assets from disclosure at this stage. The documents order stands, subject to minor revisions for clarity and proportionality.
Court Disposition
Application to vary/set aside the documents order refused; minor revisions to the order permitted.
Orders
- Second defendant must produce documents relating to his means, including assets in France, by 9 July 2021.
- Examination to proceed on 26 July 2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment