Salat v Barutis [2013] EWCA Civ 1499 (20 November 2013)
The credit hire agreement was made at the consumer's home and did not include the required cancellation notice under the Regulations, rendering it unenforceable against the consumer. As a result, the consumer suffered no recoverable loss and cannot claim damages from the defendant.
- Citation
- [2013] EWCA Civ 1499
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Jitesh Salat; Defendant/respondent: Mindaugas Barutis
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Brentford County Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Cancellation of Contracts, Consumer Protection, Credit Hire Agreements, Unenforceable Contracts, Doorstep Selling Regulations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jitesh Salat
Claimant/appellant
Mindaugas Barutis
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Brentford County Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the credit hire agreement was made at the consumer's home and thus subject to the Cancellation of Contracts Regulations 2008
- 2 Whether failure to provide a cancellation notice rendered the contract unenforceable
- 3 Whether the consumer suffered a recoverable loss
Ratio Decidendi
The credit hire agreement was made at the consumer's home and did not include the required cancellation notice under the Regulations, rendering it unenforceable against the consumer. As a result, the consumer suffered no recoverable loss and cannot claim damages from the defendant.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment