Altrad Services Ltd & Anor v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2023] EWCA Civ 474 (03 May 2023)
Ground 2 is a new ground of appeal not previously raised before the FTT or UT. However, permission is granted for HMRC to argue Ground 2 before the Court of Appeal, on the condition that the Court will assume in the Taxpayers' favour that their subjective intention in paying the Option Price was to reacquire the assets for use in their businesses. There is no real prejudice to the Taxpayers in allowing the point to be argued as a matter of law, provided this assumption is made.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Civ 474
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Altrad Services Limited (Formerly Cape Industrial Services Limited); Appellant/respondent: Robert Wiseman and Sons Limited; Appellant/respondent: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal (ground 2) in the Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal on Ground 2 granted to HMRC, subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Capital Allowances, Tax Avoidance, Appeals Procedure, New Points on Appeal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Altrad Services Limited (Formerly Cape Industrial Services Limited)
Appellant/respondent
Robert Wiseman and Sons Limited
Appellant/respondent
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Appellant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal (ground 2) in the Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC should be granted permission to argue a new ground of appeal (Ground 2) regarding section 11(4)(a) of the Capital Allowances Act 2001
- 2 Whether the Option Price paid by the Taxpayers constituted 'qualifying expenditure' for capital allowances purposes under section 11(4)(a) CAA 2001
Ratio Decidendi
Ground 2 is a new ground of appeal not previously raised before the FTT or UT. However, permission is granted for HMRC to argue Ground 2 before the Court of Appeal, on the condition that the Court will assume in the Taxpayers' favour that their subjective intention in paying the Option Price was to reacquire the assets for use in their businesses. There is no real prejudice to the Taxpayers in allowing the point to be argued as a matter of law, provided this assumption is made.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal on Ground 2 granted to HMRC, subject to conditions.
Orders
- HMRC granted permission to argue Ground 2 on the basis that the Court will assume the Taxpayers' subjective intention in paying the Option Price was to reacquire the assets for use in their businesses.
- Matter reserved to Lord Justice Newey and Lady Justice Whipple for substantive hearing.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment