Delinian Ltd (Formerly Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC) v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2023] EWCA Civ 1281 (03 November 2023)
Section 137(1) TCGA requires the tribunal to consider whether the entire exchange forms part of a scheme or arrangements of which the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, is tax avoidance, considering the scheme or arrangements as a whole. The FTT and UT were correct to reject HMRC's approach of isolating parts of the scheme. Since the avoidance of tax was not a main purpose of the arrangements as a whole, the statutory deferral was available.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Civ 1281
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Delinian Limited (formerly Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC); Respondent/appellant: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Upper Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Capital Gains Tax, Corporation Tax, Share Exchanges, Tax Avoidance, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Delinian Limited (formerly Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC)
Appellant/respondent
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Upper Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper construction of section 137(1) of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 regarding tax deferral on share exchanges
- 2 Whether the exchange formed part of a scheme or arrangements of which the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, was tax avoidance
- 3 Whether the scheme or arrangements should be considered as a whole or in parts for the purposes of section 137(1)
Ratio Decidendi
Section 137(1) TCGA requires the tribunal to consider whether the entire exchange forms part of a scheme or arrangements of which the main purpose, or one of the main purposes, is tax avoidance, considering the scheme or arrangements as a whole. The FTT and UT were correct to reject HMRC's approach of isolating parts of the scheme. Since the avoidance of tax was not a main purpose of the arrangements as a whole, the statutory deferral was available.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- HMRC's appeal dismissed
- Euromoney's cross-appeal (Respondent's Notice) dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment