B (Children), Re [2008] EWCA Civ 695 (21 May 2008)
It was open to the judge to change his mind based on significant new evidence, including the new guardian's firm recommendation for adoption and the psychologist's ambivalence, and to dispense with the mother's consent as the welfare of the children required it.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Civ 695
- Parties
- Applicants: Unmarried parents; First Respondent: Salford City Council; Second and Third Respondents: C and S (children) by their Children's Guardian
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Permission to Appeal Against Care and Placement Orders
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Care Orders, Placement Orders, Adoption, Dispensation of Parental Consent, Children's Welfare
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Unmarried parents
Applicants
Salford City Council
First Respondent
C and S (children) by their Children's Guardian
Second and Third Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Permission to Appeal Against Care and Placement Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge was entitled to change his mind regarding placement for adoption versus long-term foster care
- 2 Whether sufficient new evidence justified reopening the issue
- 3 Whether the judge properly dispensed with parental consent for adoption
Ratio Decidendi
It was open to the judge to change his mind based on significant new evidence, including the new guardian's firm recommendation for adoption and the psychologist's ambivalence, and to dispense with the mother's consent as the welfare of the children required it.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Applications for permission to appeal refused
- Care orders and placement orders for adoption upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment