Y & K (children) , Re [2003] EWCA Civ 669 (07 April 2003)

Y & K (children) , Re [2003] EWCA Civ 669 (07 April 2003)

The judge erred in terminating the proceedings prematurely, failed to properly assess and accept cogent and agreed expert medical evidence, and misapplied the law regarding the compellability of parents as witnesses in care proceedings. The appeal is allowed and the case is remitted for retrial.

Citation
[2003] EWCA Civ 669
Parties
Subject: Y & K (Children); First Respondent: KY (Mother); Second Respondent: AK (Father); Applicant/third Respondent: Newcastle-upon-Tyne City Council; Fourth Respondent: Guardian ad litem
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 April 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal (care Proceedings) / Appeal From Fact Finding Hearing in Care Proceedings
Outcome
Appeal allowed; case remitted for retrial before a section 9 judge or a circuit judge nominated by the liaison judge; no order for costs.
Legal Topics
Care Proceedings, Children Act 1989, Expert Evidence, Compellability of Witnesses, Split Hearings, Threshold Criteria
Family Law Child Protection Care Proceedings Children Act 1989 Expert Evidence Compellability of Witnesses Split Hearings Threshold Criteria

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Y & K (Children)

Subject

KY (Mother)

First Respondent

AK (Father)

Second Respondent

Newcastle-upon-Tyne City Council

Applicant/third Respondent

Guardian ad litem

Fourth Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal (care Proceedings) / Appeal From Fact Finding Hearing in Care Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in terminating care proceedings at the fact-finding stage without full assessment of evidence
  2. 2 Whether the judge was entitled to reject agreed expert medical evidence
  3. 3 Whether parents can be compelled to give evidence in care proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The judge erred in terminating the proceedings prematurely, failed to properly assess and accept cogent and agreed expert medical evidence, and misapplied the law regarding the compellability of parents as witnesses in care proceedings. The appeal is allowed and the case is remitted for retrial.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; case remitted for retrial before a section 9 judge or a circuit judge nominated by the liaison judge; no order for costs.

Orders

  • Appeal granted
  • Case remitted for retrial