A, B, C, D & E , Re [2014] EWFC B227 (18 December 2014)
The local authority breached the family's rights under Articles 6 and 8 ECHR by unlawfully and disproportionately removing the children, failing to disclose material evidence, denying fair participation in decision making, and failing to promote family life. The threshold for care proceedings was met, but the process was fundamentally unfair due to the LA's conduct. Interim care orders are made, the hearing is adjourned for further assessment, and declarations of human rights breaches are granted. Costs for wasted hearings are awarded against the local authority.
- Citation
- [2014] EWFC B227
- Parties
- Applicant Local Authority: Hampshire County Council; Respondent Mother: M (Mother); Respondent Father: F (Father); Subject Child: A (Child); Subject Child: B (Child); Subject Children: C, D, E (Children)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings (children Act 1989) / Interim Judgment on Adjournment and Human Rights Breaches
- Outcome
- Interim care orders made for all children; hearing adjourned for further assessment; declarations of human rights breaches granted; costs of wasted hearings awarded against local authority.
- Legal Topics
- Care Proceedings, Children Act 1989, Article 6 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Disclosure Obligations, Threshold Criteria, Interim Care Orders, Unlawful Removal, Damages, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hampshire County Council
Applicant Local Authority
M (Mother)
Respondent Mother
F (Father)
Respondent Father
A (Child)
Subject Child
B (Child)
Subject Child
C, D, E (Children)
Subject Children
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings (children Act 1989) / Interim Judgment on Adjournment and Human Rights Breaches
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether threshold criteria under s.31 Children Act 1989 are met
- 2 Whether the local authority breached the family's rights under Articles 6 and 8 ECHR
- 3 Whether there was unlawful removal of children
Ratio Decidendi
The local authority breached the family's rights under Articles 6 and 8 ECHR by unlawfully and disproportionately removing the children, failing to disclose material evidence, denying fair participation in decision making, and failing to promote family life. The threshold for care proceedings was met, but the process was fundamentally unfair due to the LA's conduct. Interim care orders are made, the hearing is adjourned for further assessment, and declarations of human rights breaches are granted. Costs for wasted hearings are awarded against the local authority.
Court Disposition
Interim care orders made for all children; hearing adjourned for further assessment; declarations of human rights breaches granted; costs of wasted hearings awarded against local authority.
Orders
- Interim care orders for all five children
- Adjournment of final hearing for further assessment and therapy
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment