H (Children) (Findings of Fact) [2025] EWCA Civ 993 (28 July 2025)
The judge's finding that CH sexually abused H at a Hallowe'en party in 2023 was unsafe due to inadequate analysis of the evidence, failure to address discrepancies and contamination in the accounts, and insufficient reasoning for accepting H's allegation given his history of false statements. Related findings attributing sexualised behaviour to abuse or inappropriate boundaries were also evidentially insecure. Findings regarding ongoing risk and unsupervised contact were sufficiently supported and stand.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Civ 993
- Parties
- First Appellant (intervenor): CH; Second Appellant: Mother; First Respondent: Local Authority; Second Respondent: Father; Third and Fourth Respondents: Children's Guardian (for H and R)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (family Law Care Proceedings) / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; key findings set aside; case remitted for further case management.
- Legal Topics
- Care Proceedings, Fact Finding Hearing, Sexual Abuse Allegations, Threshold Criteria, Judicial Reasoning, Appeal Against Findings of Fact
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CH
First Appellant (intervenor)
Mother
Second Appellant
Local Authority
First Respondent
Father
Second Respondent
Children's Guardian (for H and R)
Third and Fourth Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal (family Law Care Proceedings) / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in making findings of sexual abuse against CH based on unreliable evidence
- 2 Whether the judge failed to properly analyse the chronology and reliability of allegations made by H
- 3 Whether findings attributing sexualised behaviour to inappropriate boundaries in the home were evidentially justified
Ratio Decidendi
The judge's finding that CH sexually abused H at a Hallowe'en party in 2023 was unsafe due to inadequate analysis of the evidence, failure to address discrepancies and contamination in the accounts, and insufficient reasoning for accepting H's allegation given his history of false statements. Related findings attributing sexualised behaviour to abuse or inappropriate boundaries were also evidentially insecure. Findings regarding ongoing risk and unsupervised contact were sufficiently supported and stand.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; key findings set aside; case remitted for further case management.
Orders
- Finding 3 (sexual abuse by CH) set aside
- Finding 4 (sexualised behaviour) stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment