Media-Saturn Holding GmbH & Ors v Toshiba Information Systems (UK) Ltd & Ors [2019] EWHC 1095 (Ch) (02 May 2019)
The court held that the claims against TIS and PE should not be struck out or summarily dismissed at this stage. The pleadings, though reliant on attribution grounds and subject to information asymmetry, were sufficiently arguable to proceed to trial, particularly given the complexity of competition claims and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 1095 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimants/respondents: Media-Saturn Holding GmbH & Others; Defendant/applicant: Toshiba Information Systems (U.K.) Limited; Defendant/applicant: Toshiba Electronics Europe GmbH; Defendant/applicant: Toshiba Europe GmbH; Defendant/applicant: Panasonic Europe B.V.; Defendant/applicant: Panasonic Marketing Europe GmbH; Defendant/applicant: Panasonic Industry Europe GmbH
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Strike Out/summary Judgment Applications in Competition Damages Claims / Interlocutory (pre Trial)
- Outcome
- Applications to strike out and for summary judgment dismissed; claims to proceed to trial.
- Legal Topics
- Cartel Damages, Article 101 TFEU, Economic Torts, Strike Out Applications, Summary Judgment, Jurisdiction, Attribution of Liability, Decisive Influence, Provimi Ground
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Media-Saturn Holding GmbH & Others
Claimants/respondents
Toshiba Information Systems (U.K.) Limited
Defendant/applicant
Toshiba Electronics Europe GmbH
Defendant/applicant
Toshiba Europe GmbH
Defendant/applicant
Panasonic Europe B.V.
Defendant/applicant
Panasonic Marketing Europe GmbH
Defendant/applicant
Panasonic Industry Europe GmbH
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Strike Out/summary Judgment Applications in Competition Damages Claims / Interlocutory (pre Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claims against TIS and PE disclose reasonable grounds or have real prospect of success
- 2 Whether English court has jurisdiction over foreign defendants
- 3 Whether economic tort claims are arguable under English law
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the claims against TIS and PE should not be struck out or summarily dismissed at this stage. The pleadings, though reliant on attribution grounds and subject to information asymmetry, were sufficiently arguable to proceed to trial, particularly given the complexity of competition claims and the need for disclosure. The economic tort claims were also not so unarguable as to warrant summary disposal. Jurisdictional challenges were rejected as premature, contingent on the outcome of the anchor defendant applications.
Court Disposition
Applications to strike out and for summary judgment dismissed; claims to proceed to trial.
Orders
- Claims against TIS and PE not struck out or summarily dismissed.
- Jurisdictional challenges by TEEG, TEG, PME, and PI rejected at this stage.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment