Re M: K v L & Anor
Intimate images, whether still or moving, should only be admitted into evidence if strictly relevant and necessary to the factual issues to be determined. The court must undertake a balancing exercise between the parties’ rights to a fair hearing and the need to protect vulnerable witnesses from unnecessary trauma. Participation directions are required for vulnerable witnesses, and unnecessary or irrelevant questioning about sexual history is prohibited. Previous judgment and transcripts tainted by procedural unfairness are excluded from the trial bundle.
- Parties
- Applicant/father: K; Respondent/mother: L; Child: M (by her children’s Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Private Law Children Proceedings / Case Management Judgment Prior to Rehearing of Fact Finding Hearing
- Outcome
- Case management directions issued; no final determination of substantive allegations.
- Legal Topics
- Case Management, Intimate Images, Vulnerable Witnesses, Domestic Abuse, Participation Directions, Evidence Admissibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K
Applicant/father
L
Respondent/mother
M (by her children’s Guardian)
Child
Procedural Posture
Private Law Children Proceedings / Case Management Judgment Prior to Rehearing of Fact Finding Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Admissibility and management of intimate images in private law children proceedings
- 2 Appropriate participation directions for a vulnerable witness alleging domestic abuse
- 3 Relevance of sexual history evidence
Ratio Decidendi
Intimate images, whether still or moving, should only be admitted into evidence if strictly relevant and necessary to the factual issues to be determined. The court must undertake a balancing exercise between the parties’ rights to a fair hearing and the need to protect vulnerable witnesses from unnecessary trauma. Participation directions are required for vulnerable witnesses, and unnecessary or irrelevant questioning about sexual history is prohibited. Previous judgment and transcripts tainted by procedural unfairness are excluded from the trial bundle.
Court Disposition
Case management directions issued; no final determination of substantive allegations.
Orders
- Intimate images to remain in the bundle but only viewed if essential; parties to produce a schedule describing and justifying relevance of each image.
- No intimate images to be viewed in open court with all parties present; only advocates and solicitors to view such material.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment