Athena Capital Fund Sicav-Fis S.C.A. & Ors. v Secretariat of State for the Holy See

Athena Capital Fund Sicav-Fis S.C.A. & Ors. v Secretariat of State for the Holy See

The Secretariat of State for the Holy See was not neutral but had adopted a partisan position by joining as a parte civile in the Vatican criminal proceedings and asserting a claim for compensation. Therefore, the declarations sought by the appellants did serve a useful purpose, and there was no compelling reason to stay the English proceedings. The High Court's case management stay was based on a flawed understanding of the Secretariat's position and was set aside.

Parties
Appellant/claimant: Athena Capital Fund SICAV-FIS S.C.A.; Appellant/claimant: Athena Capital Real Estate and Special Situations Fund 1; Appellant/claimant: WRM Capital Asset Management S.A.R.L.; Appellant/claimant: Raffaele Mincione; Respondent/defendant: Secretariat of State for the Holy See
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 July 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (case Management Stay)
Outcome
appeal allowed; case management stay set aside
Legal Topics
Case Management Stay, Negative Declaratory Relief, Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses, Utility of Declarations, Parallel Proceedings
Civil Procedure Private International Law Commercial Law Case Management Stay Negative Declaratory Relief Exclusive Jurisdiction Clauses Utility of Declarations Parallel Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Athena Capital Fund SICAV-FIS S.C.A.

Appellant/claimant

Athena Capital Real Estate and Special Situations Fund 1

Appellant/claimant

WRM Capital Asset Management S.A.R.L.

Appellant/claimant

Raffaele Mincione

Appellant/claimant

Secretariat of State for the Holy See

Respondent/defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (case Management Stay)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the High Court was correct to impose a case management stay on claims for negative declarations regarding liability in connection with a property transaction.
  2. 2 Whether the Secretariat of State for the Holy See was a neutral party or had adopted a partisan position in related Vatican criminal proceedings.
  3. 3 Whether the declarations sought by the appellants served a useful purpose.

Ratio Decidendi

The Secretariat of State for the Holy See was not neutral but had adopted a partisan position by joining as a parte civile in the Vatican criminal proceedings and asserting a claim for compensation. Therefore, the declarations sought by the appellants did serve a useful purpose, and there was no compelling reason to stay the English proceedings. The High Court's case management stay was based on a flawed understanding of the Secretariat's position and was set aside.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed; case management stay set aside

Orders

  • The appeal is allowed.
  • The case management stay imposed by the High Court is set aside.