Dalling v R J Heale & Co Ltd

Dalling v R J Heale & Co Ltd

The second accident was causally related to the original tortious injury, and the claimant’s impaired ability to control his drinking was a consequence of the defendant’s tort. The claimant’s actions were not wholly voluntary, so the chain of causation was not broken. Both parties bore responsibility, justifying a reduction for contributory negligence but not a complete bar to recovery.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: Stephen John Dalling; Defendant/appellant: R J Heale & Co Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 April 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Assessment of Damages After Trial
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Causation, Novus Actus Interveniens, Contributory Negligence, Assessment of Damages
Tort Law Personal Injury Causation Novus Actus Interveniens Contributory Negligence Assessment of Damages

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Stephen John Dalling

Claimant/respondent

R J Heale & Co Ltd

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Assessment of Damages After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant is liable for damages arising from a second accident allegedly causally connected to the original tortious injury
  2. 2 Whether the claimant's voluntary intoxication constituted a novus actus interveniens breaking the chain of causation
  3. 3 Whether contributory negligence should reduce damages for the second accident

Ratio Decidendi

The second accident was causally related to the original tortious injury, and the claimant’s impaired ability to control his drinking was a consequence of the defendant’s tort. The claimant’s actions were not wholly voluntary, so the chain of causation was not broken. Both parties bore responsibility, justifying a reduction for contributory negligence but not a complete bar to recovery.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Defendant/Appellant to remain liable for damages for the second accident, subject to one-third reduction for contributory negligence