Bailey v The Ministry of Defence & Anor
The court found that negligent post-ERCP care, specifically inadequate resuscitation and failure to intervene, materially contributed to the claimant's overall weakness, which, together with pancreatitis, caused her to aspirate vomit and suffer cardiac arrest and hypoxic brain damage. Material contribution suffices for causation in clinical negligence.
- Parties
- Claimant: Grannia Geraldine Bailey; Litigation Friend: Maurice Bailey; First Defendant: The Ministry of Defence; Second Defendant: Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Clinical Negligence / Judgment on Breach of Duty and Causation
- Outcome
- Judgment for the claimant; damages to be assessed.
- Legal Topics
- Causation, Material Contribution, Standard of Care, Resuscitation, Post Operative Care
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Grannia Geraldine Bailey
Claimant
Maurice Bailey
Litigation Friend
The Ministry of Defence
First Defendant
Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Clinical Negligence / Judgment on Breach of Duty and Causation
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether negligent post-ERCP care caused or materially contributed to the claimant's cardiac arrest and hypoxic brain damage
- 2 Whether failure to resuscitate and monitor post-ERCP breached the standard of care
- 3 Whether the claimant's weakness and inability to protect airway was causally linked to negligent treatment
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that negligent post-ERCP care, specifically inadequate resuscitation and failure to intervene, materially contributed to the claimant's overall weakness, which, together with pancreatitis, caused her to aspirate vomit and suffer cardiac arrest and hypoxic brain damage. Material contribution suffices for causation in clinical negligence.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the claimant; damages to be assessed.
Orders
- Claim against second defendant dismissed with no order as to costs.
- Judgment for claimant against first defendant; damages to be assessed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment