R v Anton Hull
The sentence of six years' imprisonment was unduly lenient as it failed to reflect the seriousness of the offence, the multiple Category A culpability factors, and the need for an upward adjustment from the 12-year starting point. Proper weight to mitigation would reduce the sentence to twelve-and-a-half years, with a 25% reduction for guilty plea resulting in nine years three months' imprisonment.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Offender: Anton Hull
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988; Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Causing Death by Dangerous Driving, Sentencing, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Appeal by Attorney General
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Anton Hull
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988; Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for causing death by dangerous driving was unduly lenient
- 2 Proper application of the Sentencing Council guideline for causing death by dangerous driving
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of six years' imprisonment was unduly lenient as it failed to reflect the seriousness of the offence, the multiple Category A culpability factors, and the need for an upward adjustment from the 12-year starting point. Proper weight to mitigation would reduce the sentence to twelve-and-a-half years, with a 25% reduction for guilty plea resulting in nine years three months' imprisonment.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; sentence increased
Orders
- Original sentence of six years' imprisonment quashed
- Substituted sentence of nine years three months' imprisonment imposed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment