Openwork Ltd v Forte
The clawback provision, though lacking an explicit formula, was sufficiently certain as it identified the relevant factors (amount invested, amount withdrawn, length of time invested) and the parties’ intent was clear. The judge was correct to apply a straight-line calculation to give effect to the provision. Openwork proved on the balance of probabilities that it had repaid the commission to Sterling, entitling it to clawback from Mr Forte.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Openwork Limited; Defendant/appellant: Alessandro Forte
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Certainty of Contractual Terms, Enforceability of Clawback Provisions, Evidence of Payment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Openwork Limited
Claimant/respondent
Alessandro Forte
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the clawback provision in the contract was sufficiently certain to be enforceable
- 2 Whether Openwork had repaid its share of the commission to Sterling, entitling it to clawback from Mr Forte
Ratio Decidendi
The clawback provision, though lacking an explicit formula, was sufficiently certain as it identified the relevant factors (amount invested, amount withdrawn, length of time invested) and the parties’ intent was clear. The judge was correct to apply a straight-line calculation to give effect to the provision. Openwork proved on the balance of probabilities that it had repaid the commission to Sterling, entitling it to clawback from Mr Forte.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- Application to admit fresh evidence is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment