The Pensions Regulator v A Admin Ltd & Ors [2014] EWHC 1378 (Ch) (08 May 2014)
The trust deeds governing the schemes are void for uncertainty as they do not provide a method for computing the primary pension, and do not confer a trustee discretion to determine the amount. If valid, the deeds confer a right to a future pension within section 91(1) Pensions Act 1995. Section 91(5) limits the exception for surrenders to cases where new benefits for dependants are provided under the same scheme.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 1378 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: The Pensions Regulator; First Defendant: A Admin Limited; Second Defendant: Warwick Pensions Administration Limited; Third Defendant: Lincoln Pensions Administration Limited; Fourth Defendant: Baxendale-Walker LLP; Fifth Defendant: Paul Michael Baxendale-Walker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Pensions Regulatory / Judgment on Preliminary Issues and Applications
- Outcome
- Preliminary issues determined in favour of the Claimant; applications by Fifth Defendant dismissed; costs awarded to Claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Certainty of Trusts, Occupational Pension Schemes, Inalienability of Pension Rights, Statutory Interpretation, Restitution, Misuse of Pension Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Pensions Regulator
Claimant
A Admin Limited
First Defendant
Warwick Pensions Administration Limited
Second Defendant
Lincoln Pensions Administration Limited
Third Defendant
Baxendale-Walker LLP
Fourth Defendant
Paul Michael Baxendale-Walker
Fifth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Pensions Regulatory / Judgment on Preliminary Issues and Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the beneficial interests of members under the trust deeds are void for uncertainty ('Certainty Issue')
- 2 Whether the trust deeds confer a right to a future pension within the meaning of section 91(1) of the Pensions Act 1995 ('Future Pension Issue')
- 3 Whether section 91(5) of the Pensions Act 1995 limits the exclusion from the general prohibition of surrenders to those where new benefits are provided under the same scheme ('Same Scheme Issue')
Ratio Decidendi
The trust deeds governing the schemes are void for uncertainty as they do not provide a method for computing the primary pension, and do not confer a trustee discretion to determine the amount. If valid, the deeds confer a right to a future pension within section 91(1) Pensions Act 1995. Section 91(5) limits the exception for surrenders to cases where new benefits for dependants are provided under the same scheme.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issues determined in favour of the Claimant; applications by Fifth Defendant dismissed; costs awarded to Claimant.
Orders
- Declaration that the trust deeds are void for uncertainty as to beneficial interests.
- Declaration that, if valid, the deeds confer a right to a future pension within section 91(1) Pensions Act 1995.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment