Swale Borough Council v The First Secretary of State & Anor [2005] EWHC 290 (Admin) (04 March 2005)
The Inspector was entitled to find, on the evidence, that the barn had been used as a single dwelling house for a continuous period of four years prior to the LDC application, and that periods of non-occupation did not interrupt that use in planning terms. The Inspector did not misdirect himself in law or take into account immaterial considerations. The decision letter was sufficiently clear and reasoned. Accordingly, the application under section 288 fails.
- Citation
- [2005] EWHC 290 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Swale Borough Council; First Defendant: The First Secretary of State; Second Defendant: Mr R. Lee
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (planning) / Final Judgment on Application Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Certificate of Lawful Use, Enforcement Notice, Residential Use, Planning Permission, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Swale Borough Council
Claimant
The First Secretary of State
First Defendant
Mr R. Lee
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (planning) / Final Judgment on Application Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Inspector erred in law in finding that the barn had been used as a single dwelling house for a continuous period of four years prior to the LDC application, thereby conferring immunity from enforcement action under section 171B(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990.
- 2 Whether the Inspector took into account immaterial considerations or misapplied the law as set out in Thurrock Borough Council v Secretary of State for the Environment Transport and the Regions & Terry Holding [2002] EWCA Civ 226.
Ratio Decidendi
The Inspector was entitled to find, on the evidence, that the barn had been used as a single dwelling house for a continuous period of four years prior to the LDC application, and that periods of non-occupation did not interrupt that use in planning terms. The Inspector did not misdirect himself in law or take into account immaterial considerations. The decision letter was sufficiently clear and reasoned. Accordingly, the application under section 288 fails.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application under section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 is dismissed.
- Appeal under section 289 would also fail if leave were given to adduce it out of time.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment