Rastrum Ltd & Anor v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Anor [2009] EWHC 160 (Admin) (04 February 2009)
The period for enforcement against the 1987 commencement works has expired, rendering those operations lawful. Therefore, the planning permission and approval are extant, and the District Council should have granted a certificate of lawfulness for the proposed development. The Inspector erred in not allowing the appeal on this ground.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 160 (Admin)
- Parties
- First Claimant: Rastrum Limited; Second Claimant: Mr R A Benge; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; Second Defendant: Rother District Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 February 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / High Court Judgment on Consolidated Claims
- Outcome
- Applications succeed; Inspector's decision quashed to the extent indicated.
- Legal Topics
- Certificate of Lawful Use, Legitimate Expectation, Abuse of Power, Enforcement of Planning Permissions, Section 106 Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rastrum Limited
First Claimant
Mr R A Benge
Second Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
First Defendant
Rother District Council
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 / High Court Judgment on Consolidated Claims
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the commencement of works in 1987 lawfully implemented the planning permission RR/79/0400 and RR/84/0498
- 2 Whether the works, if commenced in breach of condition, are now immune from enforcement and thus lawful
- 3 Whether the conduct of the local authorities created a legitimate expectation that the permissions were extant
Ratio Decidendi
The period for enforcement against the 1987 commencement works has expired, rendering those operations lawful. Therefore, the planning permission and approval are extant, and the District Council should have granted a certificate of lawfulness for the proposed development. The Inspector erred in not allowing the appeal on this ground.
Court Disposition
Applications succeed; Inspector's decision quashed to the extent indicated.
Orders
- District Council should have granted a certificate of lawfulness for the proposed development.
- If the primary ground fails, the issues of legitimate expectation and abuse of power are to be remitted for further consideration.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment