Dunsfold Park Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government & Anor
The 1951 planning permission did not authorise unrestricted aviation activities but was limited to erection, repair, and flight testing of aircraft. After BAe ceased operations, a material change of use occurred due to the introduction of multiple occupiers and non-aviation activities, requiring new planning permissions. At least one of the 2008 temporary permissions was implemented, and its conditions restricting aviation activities were engaged. The Inspector's interpretation and application of planning law were correct, and the Claimant is not entitled to a certificate of lawful use for unrestricted aviation activities.
- Parties
- Claimant: Dunsfold Park Limited; 1st Defendant: Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government; 2nd Defendant: Waverley Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment on Application to Quash Inspector's Decision Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Certificate of Lawful Use, Interpretation of Planning Permission, Material Change of Use, Implementation of Planning Permissions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dunsfold Park Limited
Claimant
Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government
1st Defendant
Waverley Borough Council
2nd Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment on Application to Quash Inspector's Decision Under Section 288 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 1951 planning permission authorised unrestricted aviation activities at Dunsfold Aerodrome
- 2 Whether a material change of use occurred after BAe ceased operations in 2002
- 3 Whether subsequent temporary planning permissions were lawfully implemented and restrict aviation activities
Ratio Decidendi
The 1951 planning permission did not authorise unrestricted aviation activities but was limited to erection, repair, and flight testing of aircraft. After BAe ceased operations, a material change of use occurred due to the introduction of multiple occupiers and non-aviation activities, requiring new planning permissions. At least one of the 2008 temporary permissions was implemented, and its conditions restricting aviation activities were engaged. The Inspector's interpretation and application of planning law were correct, and the Claimant is not entitled to a certificate of lawful use for unrestricted aviation activities.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- Application to quash the Inspector's decision refused
- No certificate of lawful use for unrestricted aviation activities to be issued
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment