Energie Est LDA, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change & Anor [2013] EWHC 3026 (Admin) (10 October 2013)
The claimant's product was only certified for use with water, not refrigerant; the MCS decision lawfully reflected the scope of certification and did not impose additional requirements; there was no breach of EU law, domestic law, legitimate expectation, procedural fairness, or property rights.
- Citation
- [2013] EWHC 3026 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Energie Est LDA; First Defendant: Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change; Second Defendant: Microgeneration Certification Scheme Standards Management Group; Interested Party: Greenewable Energy Limited; Interested Party: Greenheat (a firm); Interested Party: Microgeneration Certification Scheme Steering Group
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 October 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Expedited Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Certification Schemes, Mutual Recognition of Standards, Legitimate Expectation, Procedural Fairness, Green Energy Regulation, Article 1 Protocol 1 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Energie Est LDA
Claimant
Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change
First Defendant
Microgeneration Certification Scheme Standards Management Group
Second Defendant
Greenewable Energy Limited
Interested Party
Greenheat (a firm)
Interested Party
Microgeneration Certification Scheme Steering Group
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Expedited Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether refusal to register claimant's product under MCS for use with refrigerant was unlawful under EU law
- 2 Whether the decision contravened the Green Energy (Definition and Promotion) Act 2009
- 3 Whether there was a breach of legitimate expectation
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's product was only certified for use with water, not refrigerant; the MCS decision lawfully reflected the scope of certification and did not impose additional requirements; there was no breach of EU law, domestic law, legitimate expectation, procedural fairness, or property rights.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment