Jamie Taylor & Anor v Nicholas Crabb & Anor
The court found that the express declaration of trust in the TR1 form was conclusive and had not been varied or superseded by proprietary estoppel. The evidence of a clear, unambiguous promise and detrimental reliance by Mrs Crabb was insufficient. The interests of the judgment creditors (the Applicants) must be considered and prevail. Accordingly, the interim charging order was made final and Mrs Crabb’s ToLATA claim was dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant / Joint Liquidator / Defendant (3rd Set): Jamie Taylor; Applicant / Joint Liquidator / Defendant (3rd Set): Dominik Theil-Czerwinke; Respondent / Defendant / Claimant (3rd Set): Nicholas Crabb; Respondent / Claimant / Defendant (3rd Set): Catherine Crabb
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Insolvency / Charging Order / to LATA Claim / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing on Charging Order and Proprietary Estoppel Claim
- Outcome
- Final charging order granted; ToLATA claim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Charging Orders, Proprietary Estoppel, Trusts of Land, Beneficial Ownership, Fraudulent Trading
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jamie Taylor
Applicant / Joint Liquidator / Defendant (3rd Set)
Dominik Theil-Czerwinke
Applicant / Joint Liquidator / Defendant (3rd Set)
Nicholas Crabb
Respondent / Defendant / Claimant (3rd Set)
Catherine Crabb
Respondent / Claimant / Defendant (3rd Set)
Procedural Posture
Insolvency / Charging Order / to LATA Claim / Final Judgment After Contested Hearing on Charging Order and Proprietary Estoppel Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a final charging order should be granted over the property at 16 Leamington Road, Southend-on-Sea, Essex, SS1 2SN in favour of the joint liquidators of Courtside Recycling Limited against Mr Crabb's beneficial interest.
- 2 Whether Mrs Crabb is entitled to a declaration of sole beneficial ownership of the property by reason of proprietary estoppel, varying or superseding the express declaration of trust.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the express declaration of trust in the TR1 form was conclusive and had not been varied or superseded by proprietary estoppel. The evidence of a clear, unambiguous promise and detrimental reliance by Mrs Crabb was insufficient. The interests of the judgment creditors (the Applicants) must be considered and prevail. Accordingly, the interim charging order was made final and Mrs Crabb’s ToLATA claim was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Final charging order granted; ToLATA claim dismissed.
Orders
- Final charging order over Mr Crabb’s beneficial interest in 16 Leamington Road, Southend-on-Sea, Essex, SS1 2SN.
- Dismissal of Mrs Crabb’s ToLATA claim for sole beneficial ownership by proprietary estoppel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment