Solad Sakander Mohammed & Ors v Sabir Ahmed Ebrahim Daji & Ors
The objective intention of the donors and lenders was that the funds for Abbey Mills were to be held on trust for the benefit of the London Tablighi Jamaat community, with local trustees, and not for the Dewsbury Trust. The Judge's findings were justified on the evidence and there was no error warranting appellate intervention.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Solad Sakander Mohammed; Claimant/respondent: Ibrahim Ahmed Shaikh; Claimant/respondent: Molvi Noorul Haque; Defendant/appellant: Sabir Ahmed Ebrahim Daji; Defendant/appellant: Mohammed Ishaq Chaudhry; Defendant/appellant: Awlad Ali; Defendant/appellant: Mushtaq Mohammed; Defendant/appellant: Hisham Hassan Mohamed Shar Lala; Defendant/appellant: Muhammad Anisuz Zaman Chowdhury; Defendant/appellant: Mohammed Hayat Khan; Defendant/appellant: Suhel Abdul Samad Bholat; Defendant/appellant: Yusuf Mohamed Seedat; Defendant/appellant: Abdul Malik; Defendant/appellant: Usman Abdullah Munshi
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (business and Property Courts, Chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Charitable Trusts, Implied Trusts, Trust Deeds, Beneficial Ownership, Donor Intention, Trustee Appointment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Solad Sakander Mohammed
Claimant/respondent
Ibrahim Ahmed Shaikh
Claimant/respondent
Molvi Noorul Haque
Claimant/respondent
Sabir Ahmed Ebrahim Daji
Defendant/appellant
Mohammed Ishaq Chaudhry
Defendant/appellant
Awlad Ali
Defendant/appellant
Mushtaq Mohammed
Defendant/appellant
Hisham Hassan Mohamed Shar Lala
Defendant/appellant
Muhammad Anisuz Zaman Chowdhury
Defendant/appellant
Mohammed Hayat Khan
Defendant/appellant
Suhel Abdul Samad Bholat
Defendant/appellant
Yusuf Mohamed Seedat
Defendant/appellant
Abdul Malik
Defendant/appellant
Usman Abdullah Munshi
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (business and Property Courts, Chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Abbey Mills is held on trust for the Dewsbury Trust or the London Trust
- 2 Whether the funds raised for Abbey Mills were intended for the Dewsbury Trust or a separate London trust
- 3 Whether the trial judge erred in findings of fact regarding donor intention and trust constitution
Ratio Decidendi
The objective intention of the donors and lenders was that the funds for Abbey Mills were to be held on trust for the benefit of the London Tablighi Jamaat community, with local trustees, and not for the Dewsbury Trust. The Judge's findings were justified on the evidence and there was no error warranting appellate intervention.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- Abbey Mills is held on the trusts of the London Trust Deed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment