Purani Swami Dharmanandan Dasji v Daveen Mavji Bhudia & Ors
It is expedient in the interests of the charity and its objects to make a comprehensive scheme amending the constitution, clarifying governance, membership, appointment and removal of directors, and the role of the Mahant Swami, with primary powers of appointment and removal of directors and constitutional amendment vested in the membership (subject to Mahant Swami’s consent), and with appropriate procedural safeguards, as this approach balances the intentions of the founders with the practical needs and sustainability of the charity.
- Parties
- Claimant: Purani Swami Dharmanandan Dasji; 1st Defendant: Daveen Mavji Bhudia; 2nd Defendant: Hari Jadavji Halai; 3rd Defendant: Jadavji Ramji Hirani; 4th Defendant: Manji Jina Hirani; 5th Defendant: Naran Harji Gami; 6th Defendant: Devshi Dayalal Gami; 7th Defendant: Punit G Patel; 8th Defendant: Lalji Mawji Vekaria; 9th Defendant: Jitendra Manji Vekaria; 10th Defendant: Mansukh Mawji Vekaria; 11th Defendant: Prakash Manji Vekaria; 12th Defendant: Khimji Ramji Patel; 13th Defendant: Mitesh Bhimji Patel; 14th Defendant: Parbat Kanji Varsani; 15th Defendant: His Majesty’s Attorney General
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Charity Scheme Approval (part 8 Claim) / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Scheme granted; comprehensive redrafting of the charity’s constitution ordered in accordance with the court’s directions.
- Legal Topics
- Charity Scheme, Constitutional Amendment, Governance of Unincorporated Associations, Role of Religious Leaders in Charities, Membership Rights, Appointment and Removal of Trustees, Dissolution of Charity, Jurisdiction of English Courts Over Charities
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Purani Swami Dharmanandan Dasji
Claimant
Daveen Mavji Bhudia
1st Defendant
Hari Jadavji Halai
2nd Defendant
Jadavji Ramji Hirani
3rd Defendant
Manji Jina Hirani
4th Defendant
Naran Harji Gami
5th Defendant
Devshi Dayalal Gami
6th Defendant
Punit G Patel
7th Defendant
Lalji Mawji Vekaria
8th Defendant
Jitendra Manji Vekaria
9th Defendant
Mansukh Mawji Vekaria
10th Defendant
Prakash Manji Vekaria
11th Defendant
Khimji Ramji Patel
12th Defendant
Mitesh Bhimji Patel
13th Defendant
Parbat Kanji Varsani
14th Defendant
His Majesty’s Attorney General
15th Defendant
Procedural Posture
Charity Scheme Approval (part 8 Claim) / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a scheme should be made to amend the constitution of the charity
- 2 What rights and powers should be vested in the Mahant Swami, the Board, and the membership
- 3 How directors/trustees should be appointed and removed
Ratio Decidendi
It is expedient in the interests of the charity and its objects to make a comprehensive scheme amending the constitution, clarifying governance, membership, appointment and removal of directors, and the role of the Mahant Swami, with primary powers of appointment and removal of directors and constitutional amendment vested in the membership (subject to Mahant Swami’s consent), and with appropriate procedural safeguards, as this approach balances the intentions of the founders with the practical needs and sustainability of the charity.
Court Disposition
Scheme granted; comprehensive redrafting of the charity’s constitution ordered in accordance with the court’s directions.
Orders
- Claimant to draft a scheme reflecting the court’s directions for a new constitution.
- Initial Appointed Directors to be Devshi Dayalal Gami, Naran Harji Gami, Khimji Ramji Patel, and Lalji Mawji Vekaria, pending AGM.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment