Bhamani & Ors v Sattar & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 243 (26 February 2021)

Bhamani & Ors v Sattar & Ors [2021] EWCA Civ 243 (26 February 2021)

Defendants, as objects of the charity, are entitled to defend a claim for exclusion from charity premises by alleging that the trustees are acting for collateral purposes contrary to the charity's objects; such a defence does not convert the proceedings into charity proceedings requiring authorisation under s.115 Charities Act 2011; summary judgment was properly refused as the defence had a real prospect of success and required factual investigation.

Citation
[2021] EWCA Civ 243
Parties
Appellants: Mehboob Bhamani and others; Respondents: Abdul Sattar and others
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 February 2021
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision on Summary Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Charity Trustees' Powers, Summary Judgment, Trespass, Standing to Sue, Charity Proceedings Under Charities Act 2011

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mehboob Bhamani and others

Appellants

Abdul Sattar and others

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Decision on Summary Judgment

  1. 1 Whether charity trustees have an absolute right to exclude individuals from charity premises
  2. 2 Whether defendants can raise as a defence that trustees acted for collateral purposes
  3. 3 Whether such a defence converts proceedings into 'charity proceedings' under s.115 Charities Act 2011

Ratio Decidendi

Defendants, as objects of the charity, are entitled to defend a claim for exclusion from charity premises by alleging that the trustees are acting for collateral purposes contrary to the charity's objects; such a defence does not convert the proceedings into charity proceedings requiring authorisation under s.115 Charities Act 2011; summary judgment was properly refused as the defence had a real prospect of success and required factual investigation.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Summary judgment refused; matter to proceed to trial for factual determination