Onego Shipping & Chartering BV v JSC Arcadia Shipping
The Hague/Hague-Visby Rules apply to deck cargo under a charterparty only if the bill(s) of lading do not contain an on-deck statement as required by Article 1(c); Clause 13(b) of the NYPE 1993 Form does not provide Owners with an indemnity for loss, damage, or liability caused by their own negligence or breach of seaworthiness obligations, but only for loss, damage, or liability effectively caused by the carriage of deck cargo.
- Parties
- Claimant (charterers): Onego Shipping & Chartering BV; Defendant (owners): JSC Arcadia Shipping
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69 / Judgment on Appeal From Arbitral Award
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; Tribunal's construction of Clause 13(b) set aside; further orders to be determined after hearing counsel.
- Legal Topics
- Charterparty Interpretation, Hague/hague Visby Rules, Deck Cargo Liability, Indemnity Clauses, Exclusion of Liability for Negligence, Seaworthiness Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Onego Shipping & Chartering BV
Claimant (charterers)
JSC Arcadia Shipping
Defendant (owners)
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Arbitration Act 1996, Section 69 / Judgment on Appeal From Arbitral Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Hague/Hague-Visby Rules apply to deck cargo under a charterparty absent an on-deck statement in the charterparty or bill of lading
- 2 Proper construction of Clause 13(b) of the NYPE 1993 Form regarding indemnity for loss, damage, or liability related to deck cargo, including where caused by owner's negligence or unseaworthiness
Ratio Decidendi
The Hague/Hague-Visby Rules apply to deck cargo under a charterparty only if the bill(s) of lading do not contain an on-deck statement as required by Article 1(c); Clause 13(b) of the NYPE 1993 Form does not provide Owners with an indemnity for loss, damage, or liability caused by their own negligence or breach of seaworthiness obligations, but only for loss, damage, or liability effectively caused by the carriage of deck cargo.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; Tribunal's construction of Clause 13(b) set aside; further orders to be determined after hearing counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment