Parbulk Ii A/S v Heritage Maritime Ltd SA [2011] EWHC 2917 (Comm) (08 November 2011)

Parbulk Ii A/S v Heritage Maritime Ltd SA [2011] EWHC 2917 (Comm) (08 November 2011)

The Court held that there is no settled principle that mere demand for future hire constitutes automatic waiver of the right to terminate for prior non-payment in charterparty disputes. The Tribunal was correct to consider all surrounding circumstances, including the Owners' communications and actions after 5 June 2009, which indicated no unequivocal affirmation of contract continuation. The Owners' termination of the charterparty on 22 June 2009 was valid, and Charterers' conduct amounted to repudiatory breach entitling Owners to terminate.

Citation
[2011] EWHC 2917 (Comm)
Parties
Arbitration Claimant: Parbulk II A/S; Arbitration Defendant: Heritage Maritime Ltd SA
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
08 November 2011
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Arbitration Act 1996, S.69 / Judgment on Appeal From Arbitral Award
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; arbitral award upheld
Legal Topics
Charterparty Termination, Waiver of Contractual Rights, Repudiatory Breach, Arbitration Appeals
Commercial Law Arbitration Shipping Law Charterparty Termination Waiver of Contractual Rights Repudiatory Breach Arbitration Appeals

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Parbulk II A/S

Arbitration Claimant

Heritage Maritime Ltd SA

Arbitration Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under Arbitration Act 1996, S.69 / Judgment on Appeal From Arbitral Award

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Owners waived right to terminate charterparty by demanding future hire after defaults
  2. 2 Whether Charterers' conduct amounted to repudiatory breach
  3. 3 Whether notice of termination was valid acceptance of repudiation

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that there is no settled principle that mere demand for future hire constitutes automatic waiver of the right to terminate for prior non-payment in charterparty disputes. The Tribunal was correct to consider all surrounding circumstances, including the Owners' communications and actions after 5 June 2009, which indicated no unequivocal affirmation of contract continuation. The Owners' termination of the charterparty on 22 June 2009 was valid, and Charterers' conduct amounted to repudiatory breach entitling Owners to terminate.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; arbitral award upheld

Orders

  • Owners' termination of charterparty upheld
  • Charterers to pay Owners US$27,031,759.04 as awarded