P v B (Permission to appeal an arbitral award: children) [2025] EWFC 69 (B) (10 January 2025)
There was no duty on the arbitrator to reconsider her determination absent both parties' agreement; the arbitrator conducted a sufficient welfare analysis and balanced the parties' positions; the grounds of challenge have no real prospect of success under either test for permission to appeal.
- Citation
- [2025] EWFC 69 (B)
- Parties
- Father: P (DP); Mother: B (LB)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Children (permission to Appeal Arbitral Award) / Permission to Appeal (on Paper, Without Hearing)
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Child Arrangements, Arbitral Award Challenge, Permission to Appeal, Welfare Principle, Arbitration Act 1996
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P (DP)
Father
B (LB)
Mother
Procedural Posture
Family Law Children (permission to Appeal Arbitral Award) / Permission to Appeal (on Paper, Without Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the arbitrator erred in refusing to reconsider the division of summer holidays
- 2 Whether the arbitrator failed to conduct a welfare analysis
- 3 Whether the arbitrator failed to give reasons for the division of time
Ratio Decidendi
There was no duty on the arbitrator to reconsider her determination absent both parties' agreement; the arbitrator conducted a sufficient welfare analysis and balanced the parties' positions; the grounds of challenge have no real prospect of success under either test for permission to appeal.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal the arbitral determinations of 31 May and 12 July 2024 is refused.
- Applicant may request reconsideration at oral hearing within 7 days of service.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment