A v B [2025] EWFC 329 (B) (12 June 2025)
The court found the mother's allegations of abduction and risk were misleading and not supported by evidence; the father's account was preferred as credible and consistent; the arrangements for the children were agreed and not imposed; the welfare of the children is best served by a shared care arrangement as recommended by the section 7 report.
- Citation
- [2025] EWFC 329 (B)
- Parties
- Applicant (mother): A; Respondent (father): B
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Child Arrangements (children Act 1989) / Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Child arrangement orders granted for shared care; prohibited steps order refused.
- Legal Topics
- Child Arrangements, Prohibited Steps Order, Shared Care, Domestic Abuse Allegations, Fact Finding, Welfare Checklist
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Applicant (mother)
B
Respondent (father)
Procedural Posture
Child Arrangements (children Act 1989) / Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the father abducted X from the mother's care
- 2 Whether the mother provided misleading information to the court
- 3 Whether a prohibited steps order is required
Ratio Decidendi
The court found the mother's allegations of abduction and risk were misleading and not supported by evidence; the father's account was preferred as credible and consistent; the arrangements for the children were agreed and not imposed; the welfare of the children is best served by a shared care arrangement as recommended by the section 7 report.
Court Disposition
Child arrangement orders granted for shared care; prohibited steps order refused.
Orders
- Children to live with both parents in a shared care arrangement as per section 7 report recommendations.
- Communications between parents to be via parenting app.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment