A v S [2025] EWFC 331 (B) (30 July 2025)
Direct supervised contact between the father and children is ordered as it is in the children's best interests, with no sufficient evidence that contact would expose them to harm. The proven domestic abuse predated the children's awareness and there was a significant period of cohabitation without incident. The father's motive of immigration advantage does not outweigh the welfare benefits of restoring the parental relationship. Declaration of parentage and parental responsibility for L are granted to place both children on equal terms.
- Citation
- [2025] EWFC 331 (B)
- Parties
- Applicant Father: A; Respondent Mother: S
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Children Act 1989 Proceedings (child Arrangements, Declaration of Parentage, Parental Responsibility) / Final Hearing and Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; direct supervised contact ordered; declaration of parentage and parental responsibility for L granted.
- Legal Topics
- Child Arrangements, Parental Responsibility, Declaration of Parentage, Domestic Abuse, Contact Orders, Welfare of the Child, Immigration and Family Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Applicant Father
S
Respondent Mother
Procedural Posture
Children Act 1989 Proceedings (child Arrangements, Declaration of Parentage, Parental Responsibility) / Final Hearing and Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether direct contact between father and children should be ordered
- 2 Whether a declaration of parentage should be made for L
- 3 Whether parental responsibility should be granted to the father for L
Ratio Decidendi
Direct supervised contact between the father and children is ordered as it is in the children's best interests, with no sufficient evidence that contact would expose them to harm. The proven domestic abuse predated the children's awareness and there was a significant period of cohabitation without incident. The father's motive of immigration advantage does not outweigh the welfare benefits of restoring the parental relationship. Declaration of parentage and parental responsibility for L are granted to place both children on equal terms.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; direct supervised contact ordered; declaration of parentage and parental responsibility for L granted.
Orders
- Monthly supervised contact at a contact centre for 18 months, up to two hours per session, funded by the father.
- Father to continue sending letters and photos between contact sessions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment