K v R & Ors

K v R & Ors

There are no safeguarding issues or welfare concerns to prevent the progression of contact. The acrimony between adults is not a sufficient reason to restrict contact. It is in the best welfare interests of the children to have significant contact with both parents and regular contact with paternal grandparents, and these arrangements should be formalised by court order.

Parties
Applicant Father: K; Respondent Mother: R; Respondents: Respondent Grandparents
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 August 2025
Procedural Posture
Child Arrangements Application / Judgment
Outcome
Applications granted
Legal Topics
Child Arrangements, Contact Orders, Parental Responsibility, Grandparent Contact

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

K

Applicant Father

R

Respondent Mother

Respondent Grandparents

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Child Arrangements Application / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether to increase the father's contact with the children and formalise it by order
  2. 2 Whether to make a contact order in favour of the paternal grandparents

Ratio Decidendi

There are no safeguarding issues or welfare concerns to prevent the progression of contact. The acrimony between adults is not a sufficient reason to restrict contact. It is in the best welfare interests of the children to have significant contact with both parents and regular contact with paternal grandparents, and these arrangements should be formalised by court order.

Court Disposition

Applications granted

Orders

  • Progression of contact in line with the father's proposals for increased contact, to be embodied in a court order.
  • A joint lives with order is made to reflect significant time with both parents.