S (A Child)
The trial judge's findings and conclusions were open to her on the evidence, and her exercise of discretion in making the child arrangements order in favour of the mother was not flawed, erroneous, or wrong. The appellate court found no serious procedural error or irregularity to justify interference.
- Parties
- Appellant/father: AB; Respondent/mother: Mother (name not provided)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Child Arrangements / Appeal From Family Court Decision on Child Arrangements Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Child Arrangements Order, Welfare of the Child, Appeal Procedure, Parental Responsibility, Risk of Abduction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AB
Appellant/father
Mother (name not provided)
Respondent/mother
Procedural Posture
Family Law Child Arrangements / Appeal From Family Court Decision on Child Arrangements Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in making a child arrangements order in favour of the mother
- 2 Whether the judge gave sufficient weight to the risk of abduction, safeguarding concerns, and the status quo
- 3 Whether the judge properly considered the evidence and recommendations of CAFCASS
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's findings and conclusions were open to her on the evidence, and her exercise of discretion in making the child arrangements order in favour of the mother was not flawed, erroneous, or wrong. The appellate court found no serious procedural error or irregularity to justify interference.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed. The child arrangements order in favour of the mother stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment