S (Children), Re [2001] EWCA Civ 299 (12 February 2001)
The application for permission to appeal is refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate any important point of principle or practice or other compelling reason as required by section 55 of the Access to Justice Act 1999. The previous judgments were thorough and careful, and there is no basis for further review.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 299
- Parties
- Applicant Father: Mr. W; Respondent Judge: Her Honour Judge Eaglestone
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (second Tier Appeal)
- Outcome
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Child Contact, Appeals, Access to Justice Act 1999 Section 55
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr. W
Applicant Father
Her Honour Judge Eaglestone
Respondent Judge
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal (second Tier Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant father meets the threshold under section 55 of the Access to Justice Act 1999 for a second-tier appeal
- 2 Whether there is an important point of principle or practice or other compelling reason to grant permission to appeal
Ratio Decidendi
The application for permission to appeal is refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate any important point of principle or practice or other compelling reason as required by section 55 of the Access to Justice Act 1999. The previous judgments were thorough and careful, and there is no basis for further review.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal refused
- Application for permission to appeal to the European Court of Human Rights refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment