Awodiya & Anor v HM Revenue and Customs [2019] EWHC 251 (Admin) (12 February 2019)
The claimants have not exhausted their statutory remedies, and HMRC's refusal to pay provisional Child Tax Credit pending evidence of eligibility was rational; judicial review is not appropriate.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 251 (Admin)
- Parties
- First Claimant: Franklin Awodiya; Second Claimant: Victoria Awodiya; Defendants: The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Permission Hearing
- Outcome
- Permission to bring judicial review refused
- Legal Topics
- Child Tax Credit, Alternative Remedies, Judicial Review Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Franklin Awodiya
First Claimant
Victoria Awodiya
Second Claimant
The Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Permission Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC's refusal to make provisional Child Tax Credit payments was rational
- 2 Whether claimants have exhausted alternative remedies before seeking judicial review
Ratio Decidendi
The claimants have not exhausted their statutory remedies, and HMRC's refusal to pay provisional Child Tax Credit pending evidence of eligibility was rational; judicial review is not appropriate.
Court Disposition
Permission to bring judicial review refused
Orders
- Application for leave refused
- Papers referred to the Attorney General regarding Mr Ellis's conduct
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment