C v C [2003] EWCA Civ 928 (17 June 2003)
The appeal was allowed to the limited extent that the father's applications for contact were reinstated and adjourned generally, as the process by which contact orders were terminated was unsatisfactory and insufficient information was available to determine the best way forward for the children's welfare.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 928
- Parties
- Applicant/father: C; Respondent/mother: C
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Family Appeal / Appeal From High Court, Family Division
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed to a limited extent
- Legal Topics
- Child Contact, Welfare of Children, CAFCASS Involvement, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
C
Applicant/father
C
Respondent/mother
Procedural Posture
Family Appeal / Appeal From High Court, Family Division
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the termination of contact orders in November and December 2002 was appropriate
- 2 How to facilitate contact between father and daughters given their ages and wishes
- 3 Appropriate role of CAFCASS and mental health experts in family contact disputes
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed to the limited extent that the father's applications for contact were reinstated and adjourned generally, as the process by which contact orders were terminated was unsatisfactory and insufficient information was available to determine the best way forward for the children's welfare.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed to a limited extent
Orders
- Father's applications for contact reinstated and adjourned generally
- CAFCASS Legal to draw up a list of suitable mental health experts and provide to both parents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment