SMD v LMD
Given the findings of sexual abuse, the father's refusal to accept those findings, his ongoing campaign and risk of emotional and psychological harm to A, no contact (direct or indirect) is in A's best interests. A section 91(14) order is necessary to prevent further harmful litigation, and injunctive relief is required to protect A from harmful publicity.
- Parties
- Applicant/father: SMD; Respondent/mother: LMD; Second Respondent/child: A (by Children's Guardian)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Final Judgment After Fact Finding and Welfare Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for contact dismissed; section 91(14) order and injunctive relief granted.
- Legal Topics
- Child Contact, Sexual Abuse Allegations, Section 91(14) Children Act 1989, Injunctions, Welfare of the Child
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SMD
Applicant/father
LMD
Respondent/mother
A (by Children's Guardian)
Second Respondent/child
Procedural Posture
Family / Final Judgment After Fact Finding and Welfare Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the father should have direct or indirect contact with the child A
- 2 Whether a section 91(14) order restricting further applications should be made
- 3 Whether injunctive relief should be granted to prevent publication of identifying material about A
Ratio Decidendi
Given the findings of sexual abuse, the father's refusal to accept those findings, his ongoing campaign and risk of emotional and psychological harm to A, no contact (direct or indirect) is in A's best interests. A section 91(14) order is necessary to prevent further harmful litigation, and injunctive relief is required to protect A from harmful publicity.
Court Disposition
Application for contact dismissed; section 91(14) order and injunctive relief granted.
Orders
- No direct or indirect contact between SMD and A.
- Section 91(14) Children Act 1989 order: SMD must seek court's permission before making any s8 application until A is 16 years old (25 August 2021).
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment